Abstract
Abstract. The global incidences of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity are increasing. Liver fibrosis stage is considered the strongest predictor of disease-specific mortality in MASLD. Aim. This study aimed to examine the possible associations between body composition parameters assessed by bioimpedance analysis (BIA), comorbidities, and clinically significant liver fibrosis (F2, F3) in Ukrainian patients with MASLD. Material and methods. It was an observational study involving adult patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of MASLD and liver steatosis, confirmed by ultrasound imaging, who underwent liver shear-wave elastography for assessment of liver fibrosis and body composition assessment. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine possible factors associated with clinically significant liver fibrosis (F2, F3). Results. The study included 79 patients with a mean age of 45.66±14.26 years, and 64.6% were female. The body mass index (BMI) median was 31.9 kg/m2 (Q1, Q3: 29.25, 37.3) and clinically significant liver fibrosis (F2, F3) was observed in 15.2% of patients (n=12). Patients with F2, F3 stages had higher BMI (median=37.55; Q1, Q3: 33.11, 42.45) than patients without clinically significant liver fibrosis (median=31.2; Q1, Q3: 28.63, 35.35; p=0.0027). Excessive visceral fat level was associated with clinically significant liver fibrosis (F2, F3) (odds ratio [OR]=5.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41-23.29, p=0.0145). We found that type 2 diabetes (T2D) was significantly associated with clinically significant liver fibrosis (F2, F3) in patients with MASLD (OR=4.15, 95% CI: 1.15-14.99, p=0.0297) and this association remained significant after adjustment for age and sex, as well as in the multivariable model. Conclusion. We demonstrated that a high-er visceral fat level was associated with clinically significant liver fibrosis (F2, F3), suggesting that the presence of excessive visceral fat accumulation determined with BIA may be used as a potential marker of clinically significant liver fibrosis (F2, F3) in patients with MASLD. Our study also confirmed the link between T2D and significant liver fibrosis (F2, F3) in Ukrainian adults with MASLD. These findings demonstrate the importance of timely screening of this category of patients for liver fibrosis, as recommended by the current guidelines.
References
Riazi K, Azhari H, Charette JH, Underwood FE, King JA, Afshar EE, et al. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep;7(9):851-61. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00165-0.
Younossi ZM, Golabi P, Paik JM, Henry A, Van Dongen C, Henry L. The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review. Hepatology. 2023;77(4):1335-47. doi: 10.1097/ HEP.0000000000000004.
Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P, Fredrikson M, Stål P, Kechagias S, et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology. 2015;61(5):1547-54. doi: 10.1002/hep.27368.
Lomonaco R, Godinez Leiva E, Bril F, Shrestha S, Mansour L, Budd J, et al. Advanced liver fibrosis is common in patients with type 2 diabetes followed in the outpatient setting: The need for systematic screening. Diabetes Care. 2021 Feb;44(2):399-406. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1997.
Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Mantzoros CS. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: From pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metabolism. 2019;92:82-97. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.014.
Kim TH, Jeong CW, Lee C, Noh S, Lim DW, Kim JW, et al. Association between body composition contents and hepatic fibrosis in sarcopenic obesity. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13):4279. Published 2023 Jun 26. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134279.
Mai Z, Chen Y, Mao H, Wang L. Association between the skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio and metabolic dysfunctionassociated fatty liver disease: A cross-sectional study of NHANES 2017-2018. J Diabetes. 2024;16(6):e13569. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13569.
Onishi S, Fukuda A, Matsui M, Ushiro K, Nishikawa T, Asai A, et al. Body composition analysis in patients with metabolic dysfunctionassociated fatty liver disease. Nutrients. 2023;15(18):3878. doi: 10.3390/nu15183878.
Dehghan M, Merchant AT. Is bioelectrical impedance accurate for use in large epidemiological studies? Nutr J. 2008;7:26. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-7-26.
Choi JW, Yoo JJ, Kim SG, Kim YS. Bioelectrical impedance analysis can be an effective tool for screening fatty liver in patients with suspected liver disease. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(11):2268. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112268.
European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO), Tacke F, Horn P, Wai-Sun Wong V, et al. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD). Obes Facts. 2024;17(4):374-444. doi: 10.1159/000539371.
Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol. 2023;79(6):1542-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.06.003.
Wattacheril JJ, Abdelmalek MF, Lim JK, Sanyal AJ. AGA Clinical practice update on the role of noninvasive biomarkers in the evaluation and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2023;165(4):1080-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.06.013.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu; Clinical Practice Guideline Panel; Chair:; EASL Governing Board representative:; Panel members:. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis – 2021 update. J Hepatol. 2021;75(3):659-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.025.
Barr RG, Wilson SR, Rubens D, Garcia-Tsao G, Ferraioli G. Update to the Society of radiologists in ultrasound liver elastography consensus statement. Radiology. 2020;296(2):263-74. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.2020192437.
